Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Human Ethology
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Brief Reports
    • Commentaries
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Letters from the Editorial Board
    • Other
    • Research Articles
    • Theoretical Reviews
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Book Reviews
  • Best Paper Award
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://human-ethology.org/feed
ISSN 2224-4476
Brief Reports
Vol. 32, Issue 1, 2017March 31, 2017 BST

Baseline Probabilities for Two-Alternative Forced Choice Tasks When Judging Stimuli in Evolutionary Psychology: A Methodological Note

Thomas Pollet, Anthony Little,
Simulationsmethodologyprobabilitybase rate.
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.22330/heb/321/053-059
Human Ethology
Pollet, T., & Little, A. (2017). Baseline probabilities for two-alternative forced choice tasks when judging stimuli in evolutionary psychology: A methodological note. Human Ethology, 32(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.22330/heb/321/053-059
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system