This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Human Ethology
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Brief Reports
    • Commentaries
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Letters from the Editorial Board
    • Other
    • Research Articles
    • Theoretical Reviews
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Book Reviews
  • Best Paper Award
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:4849/feed
ISSN 2224-4476
Theoretical Reviews
Vol. 26, Issue 2, 2011June 30, 2011 BST

Understanding Sex Differences in Human Mortality Rates Through Tinbergen’s Four Questions

Daniel J. Kruger, Carey J. Fitzgerald,
TinbergenFour questionssex differencessexual selectionmortality
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.22330/001c.89875
Photo by Acton Crawford on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 26, Issue 2, 2011

Vol. 26, Issue 2, 2011
  • Human Ethology Bulletin (pp. 1-5)
    International Society for Human Ethology
  • Obituary: Hiram Caton
    Wulf Schievenhövel
  • Understanding Sex Differences in Human Mortality Rates Through Tinbergen's Four Questions
    Daniel J. KrugerCarey J. Fitzgerald
  • Hue and Luminosity of Human Skin: A Visual Cue for Gender Recognition and Other Mental Tasks
    Peter Frost
  • Commentary on Steklis and Steklis (2011): Graduate Interdisciplinary Programs for Training Students in Human Behavior, Evolution, and Development
    Frank Salter
  • Beyond the Brain: How the Body Shapes the Mind
    Daniel J. Povinelli
  • Human Ethology Bulletin (pp. 40-48)
    International Society for Human Ethology
Human Ethology
Kruger, D. J., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2011). Understanding Sex Differences in Human Mortality Rates Through Tinbergen’s Four Questions. Human Ethology, 26(2), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.22330/001c.89875
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system