This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Human Ethology
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Brief Reports
    • Commentaries
    • Conference Proceedings
    • Letters from the Editorial Board
    • Other
    • Research Articles
    • Theoretical Reviews
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Book Reviews
  • Best Paper Award
  • search
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:4849/feed
ISSN 2224-4476
Theoretical Reviews
Vol. 26, Issue 3-4, 2011September 30, 2011 BST

A Vindication of Eibl-Eibesfeldt’s Concept of Tötungshemmungen (Conspecific Killing Inhibitions)? Human Ethology, Military Psychology, and the Neurosciences

Johan M. G. van der Dennen,
killing inhibitionswarfaremiliatry psychologyneuroscience
Copyright Logoccby-nc-nd-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.22330/001c.89882
Photo by Steve Johnson on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 26, Issue 3-4, 2011

Vol. 26, Issue 3-4, 2011
  • Human Ethology Bulletin (pp. 1-3)
    International Society for Human Ethology
  • A Vindication of Eibl-Eibesfeldt's Concept of *Tötungshemmungen* (Conspecific Killing Inhibitions)? Human Ethology, Military Psychology, and the Neurosciences
    Johan M. G. van der Dennen
  • In Your Face: The New Science of Attraction
    Thomas R. Alley
  • The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist's Quest for What Makes Us Human
    Ferenc Kocsor
  • The Turmoil Within—a Clinician Reviews *Maladapting Minds: Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Evolutionary Theory*
    Nando Pelusi
  • Human Ethology Bulletin (pp. 40-41)
    International Society for Human Ethology
Human Ethology
van der Dennen, J. M. G. (2011). A Vindication of Eibl-Eibesfeldt’s Concept of Tötungshemmungen (conspecific Killing Inhibitions)? Human Ethology, Military Psychology, and the Neurosciences. Human Ethology, 26(3–4), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.22330/001c.89882
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system